Comparison of C4.5 and C5.0 Methods for Classification of Bad Credit and Good Credit

Bonta Zirviera Cirgon

doi:10.55927/fjst.v4i2.16

Authors

Bonta Zirviera Cirgon Institute Business and Multimedia ASMI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v4i2.16

Keywords:

Bad Credit, Fintech, Classification, C4.5, C5.0

Abstract

PT. BZC is a startup company engaged in Fintech urging on online loans. Since the last 2 years from 2016 to 2018 PT. BZC increased compared to those who added bad loans every year. This is due to better credit analysis than repairs that increase bad loans. The suitable method for overcoming this problem is based on a literature review that is using the C4.5 and C5.0 classification methods. Therefore, it is necessary to do the C4.5 and C5.0 methods first in this study so that it can know which method is the best. The results of the development of the model using this method obtained C4.5 method reached 99% and the accuracy rate of C5.0 method reached 100%.

References

Astuti, P. (2016). Komparasi Penerapan Algoritma C45, KNN dan Neural Network Dalam Proses Kelayakan Penerimaan Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor. Faktor Exacta, 9(1), 87–101.

Banjarsari, M. A., Budiman, I., & Farmadi, A. (2016). Penerapan K-Optimal Pada Algoritma Knn Untuk Prediksi Kelulusan Tepat Waktu Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Komputer Fmipa Unlam Berdasarkan Ip Sampai Dengan Semester 4. Klik - Kumpulan Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, 2(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.20527/KLIK.V2I2.26

Kurniawan, D. A., Kurniawan, Y. I., Informatika, P. S., & Surakarta, U. M. (2018). Aplikasi Prediksi Kelayakan Calon Anggota Kredit Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 5(4), 455–464.

Niu, Z., Zong, L., Yan, Q., & Zhao, Z. (2009). Auto-recognizing DBMS workload based on C5.0 algorithm. Proceedings - 2009 2nd International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, WKKD 2009, 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1109/WKDD.2009.185

Patil, P. N., Lathi, R., & Chitre, V. (2012). Comparison of C5 . 0 & CART Classification algorithms using pruning technique. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 1(4), 1–5.

Revathy, R., & Lawrance, R. (2017). Comparative Analysis of C4.5 and C5.0 Algorithms on Crop Pest Data. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5(1), 50–58. Retrieved from www.ijircce.com

Rifqo, M. H., & Arzi, T. (2016). Implementasi Algoritma C4.5 untuk Menentukan Calon Debitur dengan Mengukur Tingkat Risiko Kredit pada Bank Bri Cabang Curup. Jurnal Pseudocode, III(2), 83–90.

Septiandi, R. (2016). Analisis Data Keterlambatan Bahan Baku Berdasarkan Pernyataan Mengenai Tesis Dan Sumber Informasi Serta Pelimpahan Hak Cipta *.

Singh, S., & Giri, M. (2014). Comparative Study Id3, Cart And C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm: A Survey. International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology (IJAIST) ISSN, 3(7), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.15693/ijaist/2014.v3i7.47-52

Taufiq, I., Nur, A., Setiawan, N. Y., & Bachtiar, F. A. (2018). Prediksi Kredit Macet Berdasarkan Preferensi Nasabah Menggunakan Metode Klasifikasi C4 . 5 pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Mitra Raya Wates. 2(12).

W, Y. Y. (2007). Perbandingan Performansi Algoritma Decision Tree C5 . 0 , Cart ,. Seminar, 2007(Snati), 0–3.

Wirdhaningsih, K. P., Ratnawati, D. E., Malang, U. B., Mining, D., & Tree, D. (2013). Penerapan algoritma decision tree c5.0 untuk peramalan forex. Doro Jurnal, 2(8), 1–6.

Zhu, X., Wang, J., Yan, H., & Wu, S. (2009). Research and application of the improved algorithm C4.5 on decision tree. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Test and Measurement, 2, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTM.2009.5413078