The Transformation of Corporate Social Responsibility Meaning in Corporate Sustainability Strategies in the Era of Digital Social Pressure

Authors

  • Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta Sebelas Maret University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v4i12.331

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Sustainability Strategies, Digital Social Pressure

Abstract

This study examines how digital social pressure drives the transformation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into a strategic component of corporate sustainability. Using a qualitative multiple case study involving 12 key informants—CSR managers, sustainability staff, digital communication officers, and community representatives—data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysis of sustainability reports, CSR publications, and digital footprints. Thematic analysis reveals that digital pressure pushes companies in Sukoharjo, Boyolali, and Karanganyar to increase transparency, strengthen data-driven digital communication, and align sustainability strategies with online public expectations. CSR is increasingly repositioned as a strategic tool for building trust, enhancing reputation, and creating long-term sustainability value. The study contributes theoretically to sustainability accounting by explaining how digital pressure reshapes the meaning of CSR, and offers practical guidance for companies in developing adaptive and responsive sustainability strategies.

References

Agustini, T., Endarwati, E. T., Bassi, A., & Widarti, W. (2024). Enhancing brand image through social media marketing and CSR: The mediating role of consumer trust in Indonesian retail. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(1), 93–112.

Amankwaa, L. (2021). Ensuring rigor in qualitative research: A methodological review. Qualitative Research Journal, 21(2), 1–12.

Amelia, R., Thaariq, M. A., & Rismawati. (2025). A systematic literature review on CSR transformation and sustainability in the digital era: A social accounting perspective. Journal of Business, Management, and Accounting, 1(6). (in press).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: A step-by-step guide. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 12(3), 1–5.

Cui, J. (2024). The bidirectional relationship between digital transformation and corporate social responsibility: A legitimacy perspective. Sustainability, 16(7), Article 3029.

Feryansah, F., & Sisdianto, E. (2024). Transformasi CSR di era digital: Strategi inovatif untuk meningkatkan nilai perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 1(4), 331–344.

Fischbach, J., Adam, M., Dzhagatspanyan, V., Mendez, D., Frattini, J., & Kosenkov, O. (2022). Automatic ESG assessment of companies by mining and evaluating media coverage data: NLP approach and tool. arXiv.

Fleming, M., Beresford, B., & Cresswell, K. (2021). Triangulating qualitative data to enhance credibility: A methodological analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–10.

Given, L. M. (2020). Qualitative data analysis tools and techniques. In The Encyclopedia of Research Methods. Sage.

Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2020). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations revisited. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1), 1–15.

Gemiharto, I. (2025). Transformasi CSR menjadi strategi keberlanjutan korporasi di abad ke-21. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 11(4), 101–110.

Janiszewski, A., Jonek-Kowalska, I., Turek, M., Wodnicka, M., Rogozinska-Pawelczyk, A., & Pypno, C. (2024). Legitimacy strategies for communicating corporate activities using symbolic value. Economics and Culture, 21(2), 163–179.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2021). Systematic methodological review of interview guides in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(2), 1108–1122.

Kurniawaty, I., Fadhilah, F., & Anggiani, S. (2024). The relationship of CSR strategy towards organizational sustainability: The moderating effect of political CSR. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 5(2).

Li, J., Fu, T., Han, S., & Liang, R. (2023). Exploring the impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of media attention. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5023.

Liu, H., Han, P., & Wang, S. (2023). Enhancing corporate social responsibility in the digital economy era: Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(1), e23459.

Nicolas, M. L. D., Desroziers, A., Caccioli, F., & Aste, T. (2023). ESG reputation risk matters: An event study based on social media data. arXiv.

Nowell, L. S., & Albrecht, L. (2020). A critical review of qualitative rigor debates. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7.

Okviana, L., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., Pawito, & Rahmanto, A. N. (2025). Narrative gaps in CSR communication: From compliance to conversation in Indonesian SOEs. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 8(3), 262–272.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., & Hoagwood, K. (2020). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 47(5), 1–12.

Radisatra, B., & Ganiem, L. M. (2024). The influence of CSR communication on legitimacy, trust and reputation of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal ICT: Information and Communication Technologies, 16(1), 12–19.

Stolowy, H., Paugam, L., et al. (2023). Corporate social responsibility communication in the ICT sector: Digital issues, greenwashing, and materiality. Journal of Sustainable Business.

Sukma, F. D., & Ismail, I. (2023). Evolusi relevansi etika bisnis dan corporate social responsibility. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 12(3), 994–1008.

Tjiwidjaja, H. (2025). Digital legitimacy: A narrative analysis of management information systems for CSR program transparency in public companies. ARMADA: Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika, 6(1), Article 5549.

Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D., & Macklin, R. (2020). Advancing qualitative research by using NVivo: A practical introduction. Qualitative Social Research, 21(2), 1–19.

Zhang, J., Xu, D., & Chen, L. (2024). Enhancing supportive intention through perceived legitimacy: Social media influencer leadership and charismatic legitimation in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 50(5), Article 102511.

Published

2025-12-31